May Be Cricket Reporters Are Not Used to It

The reporters would have done well to gather facts and report them then going on a speculation spree. However, it takes a large amount of effort. There remain many questions about the information that is available to the police and why it was so hard for them to determine whether it was a murder or not.
Up until now these are the facts that I could gather from the reports. I Would like to hear from others any updates.
1. Last seen outside his room 8:30 pm
2. He sent his last email to his wife at 3:00 am (assuming he was the one who sent it).
3. Body discovered by maid at 10:00 am So the widest time window appears to be 7 hours. Coroner believes time of death nearer to 10:00. If the murder is planned would it not make more sense to do it earlier in the night giving the murderer more time before the body is discovered?
4. Some reports have said he was alive when taken to the hospital. Some suggest he was not. Which is it? Question 1: How accurately can they determine the time of death in this case?
Question 2: If he was alive when found why did the murderer leave before he was done?
Question3: Can anyone have access to the floor he was on or was some card or key required to get to that floor?
Question 4: Was their a camera in the corridor that shows anyone in the corridor of that floor during the 7 hours in question? If so who shows up on it.
5. No struggle
6. No sign of break in.
7. Danish in the adjacent room hears nothing. Suggests either he knew his assailant or it was someone who was able to get access to his room or both.
Question5: If his room had card entry were any copies made at the hotel front desk.
Question 6: Had he given a key to anyone earlier to access his room?
Question 7: Why did it take police so long to say it was Manual Strangulation? Should it not leave very obvious marks on the neck?
8. It is believed his body was moved from the bathroom.
Question 8: Why is that believed?
Question 9: How is the mess in the bathroom explained? Does it have something to do with the murder? What exactly was the location of blood, vomit and feces? To whom did each belong?
Question 10: would the murderer have something under his nails (skin or anything else from Woolmer's body). Anyone checked?
9. DNA evidence is going to be collected from the players.
Question 10: Is there some other DNA found in his room? Did the players go to his room on previous occasions?
There is more but I would like to hear answers to some of these questions from the media.